
 |
NEWS
ChanneLife
By
Keith Newman
|
|
|
|
| We
live in crazy and chaotic times. Lately, the scales have tilted
to more negative than positive. As a result, we are challenged
to grow our business and hit our financial goals. But like
the Golden Rule says, “you gotta learn to take the bad
with the good.” Further, I would contend that people
who can adapt in these times will be stronger professionally
and personally. But that doesn’t mean I want to remain
in the economic stupor forever. For this month’s ChanneLife
I focused on some examples of people who are trying to shake
things up a bit…..
- Tweeter
has hired Philo Pappas as Senior Vice President/Chief Merchandising
Officer. "We are very pleased to have someone with
Philo's wealth of merchandising and business experience
join us," says Jeff Stone, President and CEO of Tweeter
Home Entertainment Group. "His insights related to
merchandising systems, processes and controls associated
with a multi-billion dollar company will be critical as
our organization continues to grow. Coming from such a diverse
background, he also brings fresh insight into future strategy
discussions. Over the last 18 months we have been focusing
on evolving the management team, and Philo will fill a key
position in that evolution." (That’s just what
I would have said, along with, ”Congratulations and
good luck!”
- Polycom
tapped Tom Stemberg, Chairman and Co-founder of Staples,
to its Board of Directors. Stemberg opened the first Staples
store in 1986, served as Chief Executive Officer for 15
years, and currently serves as Chairman responsible for
strategic and entrepreneurial projects. Polycom looks forward
to leveraging Stemberg’s expertise to grow Polycom
and expand the market for its interactive communications
products.
- The
word from McAfee Security is direct: Finally, a brand name
that is channel-focused is directing its energy toward Enemy
#1 of Enterprise productivity – SPAM. The Company
recently released SpamKillerä for Microsoft Exchange
Small Business, and is looking to help Resellers develop
practices around e-mail management, privacy, spam and the
additional opportunities that will arise from a service-led
sales approach. “This is a hot technology
today and we know someone will sell it. We want our Resellers
to become expert on this and use it to get into new accounts
and sell deeper into their existing accounts,” said
McAfee/Network Associates Channel Chief, Mike Menagay. “With
this product, we are not asking Resellers to choose between
us and Symantec or Trend, it’s just us. There are
some competitive products but they don’t have scale,
size, and the technical depth that we do. We also believe
there is pent-up demand for this. We are bringing spam into
the big leagues,” Menagay said. According
to a recent report by Ferris Research, Inc., spam will cost
U.S. businesses over $10 billion in 2003. As this figure
is set to continue rising, the need to deploy an effective
anti-spam solution has become even more crucial. The McAfee
SpamKiller family addresses this business-critical problem
with a multi-tiered defense for the e-mail server and Internet
gateway. Because SpamKiller scans each incoming e-mail as
it reaches the server using a pre-defined set of hundreds
of rules to proactively detect and quarantine spam, employees
no longer have to waste time determining what is valid e-mail
and what is spam. And the threat of inappropriate content
reaching employee inboxes is significantly reduced, which
helps limit organizations' HR, financial and legal liability.
Additionally, the SpamKiller technology uses a highly accurate
scoring system to determine whether a particular e-mail
is spam. With the extensive set of rules that run behind
SpamKiller, each e-mail receives a positive or negative
score to determine its overall spam rating, and once spam
is detected, messages are either delivered to the end users
inbox, personal junk mail folder or a system-wide junk folder.
Pricing for 101-250 nodes is $20.38 per node (this is a
2-year subscription that includes support for the first
year).
- Even
though the value PC processor segment is relatively crowded,
Intel's plans for clock speed superiority should keep it
well ahead of its competitors in this market. According
to In-Stat/MDR (http://www.MDRonline.com),
Intel's mobile value processors will breeze to 2.7GHz at
the end of 2004 as it balances challenges from competitors
AMD, VIA and Transmeta and maintains power dissipation within
desired mobile limits but without the benefit of the power
management capabilities of the performance segment. Mobile
value would appear to be Intel's weakest position, given
the competition of AMD's Athlon XP-M, VIA's C3, and Transmeta's
Crusoe. "AMD, Transmeta and VIA will offer different
combinations of performance, power and price, but Intel's
dominant market share in the value market is not in any
danger," said Kevin Krewell, with In-Stat/MDR. "Intel
should be more concerned that the rise of `good-enough'
computing increases the appeal of the low-cost Celeron processors
and puts further pressure on Intel's already decreasing
ASPs."
- Microsoft
has made tremendous progress in positioning Windows CE and
its derivatives as one of the leading software platforms
for a large variety of electronic devices including as PDAs,
Smartphones, consumer electronics devices and many other
information appliances. Most of the devices that are starting
to use Windows CE and other software platforms are already
in volume production. This means that Windows CE device
sales will grow at very high rate as shown in the table
below. Most Windows CE platform competitors only compete
in a single or a few product segments. Only software platforms
using embedded Linux versions are competing across the board.
Even though embedded Linux is behind Windows CE in most
segments, the long-term battle will be between these two
software platforms. The only exception is handheld device
categories where Palm and Symbian are the strongest competitors
to Microsoft's Pocket PC. Computer hardware and software
platforms have started to invade many electronics device
categories and will become the preferred system architecture
for an increasing portion of electronics devices. Only the
simplest devices with fixed functionality will avoid this
trend. "Microsoft is taking advantage of the inevitable
penetration of microprocessors and embedded software platforms
into all electronics devices," says Dr. Egil Juliussen,
the author of the report. "It is not a question if
this will happen, but a question of when it will happen
for each device category. eTForecasts publishes market research
reports for the PC, PDA, information appliances and Internet
industries. For more information see www.etforecasts.com.
- EMachines,
Inc., the fastest-growing PC company in the United States
according to IDC, today announced its new spring line-up
of affordable, high-performance PCs featuring upgraded Intel(R)-based
processors starting at $399. In addition to increasing the
processing speeds and adding Ethernet networking capability
throughout its new products, the Irvine-based PC provider
has doubled the memory of its $499 and $599 models, the
T2245 and T2385, for faster, more efficient use. In addition,
T2385 offers a larger hard drive for greater storage capability.
For multimedia aficionados, these two models also include
DVD and CD-RW drives for movie and music playback and CD
recording. eMachines' new array of PCs also incorporate
Microsoft(R) Windows(R) XP Home Edition to enhance users'
digital photography, music and video experience, while augmenting
reliability and security. "With the introduction of
our new spring line-up, we offer consumers and businesses
best-in-value PCs for virtually any computing application
for home or office use," said eMachines' President
and CEO Wayne Inouye. "We also continue to vigorously
support our products by offering one of the most innovative
and comprehensive Customer Care programs in the industry."
- Back
in the day when I was editing Computer Retail Week, FAO
Schwarz’s 5th Avenue store in NYC was my benchmark
for customer-driven merchandising. Alas, their days as benchmark
for an industry in need of inspiration may be no longer.
FAO, Inc. (FAOOQ),
parent of the storied FAO Schwarz toy store, said on Monday
it lost the funding it needed to emerge from bankruptcy
and may have to shut down. The collapse of the financing
comes just a week after FAO had said it arranged for $77
million to fund its emergence from bankruptcy, which had
been set for Friday. The company's right to use cash that
is collateral for its loans expires that day, unless extended
by the lenders. FAO, based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania,
said it lost the funding because of ``unexpected complications.''
``Due to a difference in the final terms between our equity
investors and our bank lenders, the equity financing was
withdrawn,” said FAO spokesman, Alan Marcus. The Retailer,
which also runs the Zany Brainy and Right Start chains,
said it is now exploring all alternatives, including obtaining
replacement equity funding in order to complete its confirmed
plan, a sale of all or portions of its operations, and liquidation.
The Right Start sells toys for infants and toddlers, while
Zany Brainy specializes in educational toys. Last week,
FAO said a bankruptcy court judge approved its reorganization
plan and that it had a commitment for up to $77 million
in bank financing. The company sought court protection after
failing to persuade lead lender Wells Fargo Retail Finance
to relax credit terms. FAO has struggled to compete with
discounters like Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (WMT)
and rivals such as Toys R Us, Inc. (TOY).
- RadioShack
announced first quarter net income of $56.6 million or 33
cents per diluted share for the quarter ended March 31,
2003, compared with net income of $57.6 million or 31 cents
per diluted share for the first quarter a year ago. Same
store sales during the quarter increased 5 percent over
the prior year. Total sales increased 3 percent to $1,070
million, compared to total sales of $1,034 million a year
ago. Sales of wireless communications products grew 14 percent
during the three months.
- Hot
New “Play” - Turning the boom in DVD player
sales into a new income opportunity for franchisers, a Silicon
Valley company called DVDPlay today launched the nation's
first equivalent of an ATM for the entertainment industry.
Automated Entertainment Machines, or AEMs, enable franchisers
to rent or sell DVDs and run TV spot advertising and movie
trailers through strategically positioned stand-alone machines
in high-traffic locations such as fast food restaurants,
drug stores, convenience stores and universities. The AEM's
debut comes as DVD players are outselling all other home
electronic devices. Industry observers estimate the number
of DVD-ready households in the United States, already at
50 percent today, will reach 80 percent within three years.
Described as "the big red machine with the small footprint,"
an AEM looks and functions like a bank's ATM, while offering
the instant gratification of on-the-spot DVD access at a
favorite coffee house or without an extra stop on a shopping
trip. Unlike standard movie rental stores, AEMs are open
24/7. Unlike online movie rental services, there's no wait.
Additionally, users will be able to access any machine from
their home or office PC to check availability and reserve
the movie to be picked up later. "We expect the adoption
of AEMs to accelerate quickly and one day be on a par with
now ubiquitous ATMs," said Dee Cravens, Executive Vice-President
and Chief Marketing Officer of DVDPlay. "Industry analysts
estimate that DVD worldwide sales and rental revenues will
continue to grow exponentially, doubling to $40 billion
by 2007. These numbers may surprise potential franchisees
and other entrepreneurs looking for safe, new investment
opportunities in an unsettled economy. "DVDPlay generates
revenue for franchises in three important ways: rental fees,
late fees and DVD sales revenue. Rental fees are created
every time a customer uses an AEM to rent a DVD. Late fees
are based on the terms set for the rental agreement. Typically,
late fees accrue on an estimated 15% of all rentals, providing
a significant source of additional revenue every month.
Some consumers prefer to purchase the DVD outright which
gives the franchisee another easy way to bring in extra
revenue. Finally, franchisees can add advertising on the
machine's large flat panel screen, e-mail promotions and
membership loyalty programs as additional revenue streams.
Each U.S. Area of Dominant Influence (ADI) will have one
or more designated franchiser, depending on the number of
households and the territory desired; franchisees will be
able to place numerous machines within a given city or territory.
Unlike other franchise opportunities, this means that there
will be no local competition to compete for customers. Franchisees
who sign up early will have the advantage of the most desirable
U.S. markets. DVDPlay offers customer support, designed
to help new franchisees get started with every aspect of
the business. This includes things such as onsite training,
in field sales assistance, installation, maintenance and
operating manuals. Furthermore, all franchisees are supported
24/7 via a personal, secure and safe administrative site.
DVDPlay AEMs are complete, stand-alone intelligent machines,
compact in size and connected via the Internet. They are
capable of dispensing, receiving, renting and selling DVDs,
CDs and DVD games. The machines are easy to use and require
point-of-purchase payment in the form of a credit. The first
step is to select a DVD by following a friendly touch-screen
menu, swipe a credit card for payment and leave an e-mail
address to receive special discounts and promotions in the
future. Returns are simple; customers press one button on
the touch screen and slip their DVD into the designated
slot. DVDPlay automatically restocks the DVD so it's ready
for the next customer. If customers forget to return DVDs
on time, the machine automatically adds late charges to
their transactions and notifies the customer via e-mail.
All receipts are instantly sent by e-mail. DVDPlay's AEMS
are being tested in four states --New York, North Carolina,
Texas and California. For example, Duane Reed drug stores
in Manhattan and The Pantry in North Carolina are currently
testing AEMs under development agreements with Video Vending
New York, Inc. with promising results. Additional AEMs will
be rolled out nationwide when DVDPlay finalizes its franchising
agreements.
- Psst.
Here’s a tip: Batteries……Valence
Technology announced that Best Buy
has selected the N-Charge(tm) Power System as its standard
notebook battery accessory. The N-Charge system will be
marketed and sold via Best Buy's online Web site. "As
a leading Retailer, Best Buy offers the latest technology
and products to meet the everyday computer and electronics
needs of its extensive customer base," said Stephan
Godevais, Chairman and CEO of Valence. "Having the
N-Charge system selected by Best Buy is a significant accomplishment
for us as we continue to expand our distribution channels.
We look forward to working with Best Buy and helping to
provide its customers with a solution which addresses their
growing demand for more power." "Valence's N-Charge
system is a great solution for the power problem that many
of our mobile customers are faced with today," said
Michele Azar, Business General Manager, Computer Peripherals
and Accessories for Best Buy. "We've been searching
for a universal product that would not only provide additional
power to resolve this issue, but would also be compatible
with and support the various notebook brands and models
we carry. We have found it in the N-Charge system."
I'm
always looking for more “success stories,” news
and highlights. Please send your submissions to me at kanewman@sbcglobal.net.
|
NEWS
Channel
Digest
Footnote:
we generally disregard PR releases hyping market share but
in this case it seems to be relevant…Customer preference
for quality, affordable computer systems moved Dell again
into the No. 1 position of worldwide suppliers, based on quarterly
results released by industry analysts today. "Our customers
trust us to deliver the best products and services to meet
the needs of their enterprises, whether they are operating
multi-national companies or e-mailing a child's photo from
a home system," said Michael Dell, Chairman and CEO.
"Our goal is to provide unprecedented value and service
to all customers, and today's rankings are positive validation
that we are achieving that goal." IDC and Gartner, Inc.
reported Dell shipped nearly 6 million units during the first
quarter, about 500,000 more than the next systems supplier.
The reports include all shipments of servers, notebooks and
desktop systems. Wait, there’s more:
The following is a statement from HP regarding worldwide PC
market share numbers for the first quarter of calendar year
2003. "As we have consistently said, the No. 1 market
share position is a two-horse race between HP and Dell, and
the see-saw battle will continue well into the future,"
said Jim McDonnell, Vice President of Marketing, HP Personal
Systems Group. "HP and Dell are virtually neck and neck
for the third consecutive quarter with just over 500,000 of
the more than 34 million units shipped worldwide separating
the two companies. "HP continues to hold a significant
lead in key global markets such as Europe, with the No. 1
position at 20.6 percent share -- more than 50 percent greater
than the nearest competitor. In the long term, proven product
innovation and competitive pricing, two of our strengths,
will continue to play key roles in our industry, as demonstrated
by the demand for our recently introduced Media Center PC
and Tablet PC. And as we move forward, our strong international
presence and the strength of our global network of partners
will continue to provide real value to our customers -- and
set us apart in the marketplace."
Now the
Final Word from Gartner:
The PC
industry is starting 2003 on a better note, as worldwide PC
shipments totaled 34.5 million units in the first quarter
of 2003, a 5.5 percent increase from the same period last
year, according to preliminary results from Gartner. "Worldwide
first quarter 2003 results were slightly ahead of expectations,
but even so do not signal a major return to buying. Aggressive
price cutting was an important factor in maintaining PC shipment
growth during the first quarter," said Charles Smulders,
Vice President of Gartner's computing platforms worldwide
group. "The PC market felt some impact from the outbreak
of hostilities in Iraq in the second half of March, following
generally better-than-expected performances in January and
February. SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) did not
play a major factor in the growth levels on a worldwide basis."
Dell was the No. 1 Vendor for PC shipments worldwide (see
Table 1), and it experienced the strongest growth rate among
the top-tier Vendors. Hewlett-Packard slipped to the No. 2
position as its shipments declined 5.7 percent in the first
quarter.
Table
1
Preliminary
Worldwide PC Vendor Unit Shipment Estimates for 1Q03 (Thousands
of Units)
| |
1Q03 |
1Q02 |
|
| Company |
Shipments |
Market
Share (%) |
Shipments |
Market
Share (%) |
Growth
(%) |
| Dell |
5,828.4 |
16.9 |
4,687.0
|
14.3 |
24.4 |
| Hewlett-Packard |
5,375.9
|
15.6 |
5,700.4
|
17.4 |
-5.7 |
| IBM |
1,869.8 |
5.4 |
1,751.0
|
5.4 |
6.8 |
| Toshiba |
1,241.2
|
3.6 |
1,041.0
|
3.2 |
19.2 |
| NEC |
1,162.7
|
3.4 |
1,268.3
|
3.9 |
-8.3 |
| Others |
18,992.1
|
55.1 |
18,229.1
|
55.8 |
4.2 |
| Total |
34,470.1
|
100.0 |
32,676.9
|
100.0 |
5.5 |
Note:
Data includes desk-based PCs, mobile PCs and IA32 servers.
HPand Compaq are reported as one company. If combining Fujitsu
andFujitsu Siemens, the combined shipments would be in fourth
place in the worldwide PC market.
Source:
Gartner Dataquest (April 2003)
U.S. PC
shipments totaled 11.8 million units in the first quarter
of 2003, a 7.7 percent increase from the first quarter of
2002 (see Table 2). The U.S. PC market received a boost from
a strong consumer market. After the holiday season, the first
quarter is usually a quieter quarter for consumer sales, however,
Gartner analysts said desk-based PC sales were stronger than
anticipated.
Table
2
Preliminary U.S. PC Vendor Unit Shipment Estimates for 1Q03
(Thousands of Units)
| |
1Q03 |
1Q02 |
|
| Company |
Shipments |
Market
Share (%) |
Shipments |
Market
Share (%) |
Growth
(%) |
| Dell |
3,634.1
|
30.7 |
2,932.6
|
26.7 |
23.9 |
| Hewlett-Packard |
2,247.6
|
19.0 |
2,325.2
|
21.1 |
-3.3 |
| IBM |
567.8
|
4.8 |
579.3
|
5.3 |
-2.0 |
| Gateway |
506.0
|
4.3 |
645.0 |
5.9 |
-21.6 |
| Toshiba |
383.6
|
3.2 |
307.9
|
2.8 |
24.6 |
| Others |
4,506.8
|
38.0 |
4,211.3
|
38.3 |
7.0 |
| Total |
11,845.9
|
100.0 |
11,001.3
|
100.0 |
7.7 |
Note:
Data includes desk-based PCs, mobile PCs and IA32 servers.
HPand Compaq are reported as one company.
Source:
Gartner Dataquest (April 2003)
More
from Gartner on a related topic: Mobile PC growth
continued to outpace the desktop PC segment. Tablet PCs and
the launch of Intel's Centrino mobile platform continues to
bring attention to the mobile PC, but were not major factors
in driving shipments. "Centrino is focused at the corporate
market initially. In addition to budget issues, it will take
time for that community to qualify it within their IT environments,"
Smulders said. "The marketing campaign around Centrino,
however, is raising general awareness of the benefits of wireless
mobile form factors." Additional information is available
in the Gartner Dataquest Perspective "Preliminary 1Q03
PC Market Results-Slightly Better than Expected," examines
the current state of the worldwide PC industry. It also looks
at what trends are developing, and how the top-tier Vendors
are performing. These results are preliminary. Final statistics
will be available soon to clients of Gartner's PC Quarterly
Statistics Worldwide by Region program. This program offers
a comprehensive and timely picture of the worldwide PC market,
allowing product planning, distribution, marketing and sales
organizations to keep abreast of key issues and their future
implications around the globe. To subscribe to this program,
please call 408-468-8000. Additional research can be found
on Gartner's Hardware and Systems Focus Area on Gartner's
Web site at www.gartner.com/1_researchanalysis/focus/hwmkt_fa.html.
BDS
Marketing has been named a finalist in the American
Business Awards competition. The sales and marketing services
firm was recognized for its work on behalf of Motorola’s
Personal Communications Sector, the unit that manufactures
and sells wireless telephones. The firm’s multifaceted
campaign resulted in a 25 percent increase in marketshare
– from 20.8 percent to 26 percent – within a mere
12 months. BDS Marketing’s "Team Motorola"
retail services team was recognized in the Best Marketing
Team category, where it is competing with two other finalists
-- FedEx Corporation and I-many. Winners will be announced
on April 30 at a nationally broadcast awards show hosted by
Charles Osgood, host of CBS Sunday Morning and commentator
for the CBS Radio Network.. "We’re very proud of
our work for Motorola, which has significantly strengthened
its retail presence, boosted sales and enhanced its brand
awareness, especially among the key youth segment," said
Kristen des Chatelets, BDS Marketing’s chief marketing
officer.
American
Power Conversion was selected as “Vendor of
the Year,” by CompUSA in the peripherals
category and APC’s new TravelPower Case was given the
“Best of RetailVision Award”ä in the accessories
category, and was nominated for a “Best of RetailVision
Award” in the merchandising category. The recognition
by CompUSA honored the company’s high performance, account
management, quality products, and customer support for CompUSA.
The RetailVision award, voted on by the channel’s leading
Retailers, honor excellence for product innovation, channel
strategy, and presentation.
Intel
cut the price of its fastest microprocessors for desktop and
laptop PCs by as much as 38 percent. The price of Intel's
Pentium 4 microprocessor running at 3 gigahertz was cut 32
percent to $401 from $589. The price of the mobile Pentium
4 chip running at 2.4 gigahertz was cut 38 percent to $348.
Intel last made price cuts in February.
PC
Connection entered into an agreement with Sun
Microsystems, in which PC Connection will sell and
support Sun’s StorEdge Storage Solutions, Sun software,
and entry-level Sun Fire line of UNIX servers on the Solaris
8 operating environment.
Lexmark
reported first-quarter earnings of $94.6 million, or 73 cents
per share, up from its year-ago profit of $71.5 million, or
53 cents per share, and a penny ahead of Wall Street's consensus
view. Revenue rose to $1.11 billion in the three months ended
March 31 from $1.05 billion in the same period a year earlier.
Looking ahead, the Lexington, KY, maker of computer printers
and related products forecast earnings of 70 to 80 cents per
share in the second quarter, with year-over-year revenue growth
in the low- to mid-single digits.
Intuit
and LandWare announced the availability of
Pocket Quicken 2.0 for the Pocket PC platform. Packed with
the same features and enhancements as the award-winning Palm
OS version, Pocket Quicken 2.0 for Pocket PC represents the
most comprehensive handheld personal financial application
available for Quicken customers. Pocket Quicken’s excellent
connectivity to the desktop instantly mobilizes consumers’
financial data with a single ActiveSync, enabling on-the-go
access to account details, credit limits, transaction histories,
exchange rates and more. "With Pocket Quicken, millions
of Quicken users can now take advantage of the full range
of Pocket PC devices," said Mark Spain, Director of the
Mobile Devices Division at Microsoft Corp. "We are thrilled
to have Quicken join the growing list of popular PC applications
that are now available on the Pocket PC.”
Channel
Digest is about your news. What have you done lately?. Please
send your submissions to me at kanewman@sbcglobal.net.
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
Looking
to reach the top decision makers in the Retail Channel? There
is only one place you can stay top of mind: ChannelMedia.
See
the opportunities at www.channel-media.com/mediakit. |
|
RESEARCH
Picture Reliability in Projectors: Separating
DLP Projectors From the Pack?
By:
Christina
Lawson, Research Analyst, Projectors/Plasma Displays
In today’s
crowded projector market it is often difficult and at times
impossible for customers to grasp the advantages and disadvantages
of products at their disposal. Vendors in the projector market
are constantly looking for ways to pull their product away
from the pack and will often tout their projectors’
ease of use, brightness, weight, and total cost of ownership
(TCO) advantages to sell their products. Picture reliability
over time is one way the projector’s TCO can be calculated.
Projectors that offer greater picture reliability over time
will allow users to hold on to their projectors for a longer
period of time. This assumption, of course, presumes that
users will not replace their projector until the unit is obsolete,
rather than when something brighter, lighter, and better is
available. Texas Instruments, sole proprietor of the popular
DLP technology, recently contracted an outside research firm,
Munsel Color Science Laboratory at the Rochester Institute
of Technology, to investigate picture reliability in DLP and
LCD projectors. TI expects that these results will push DLP-based
projectors to a higher tier in the projector hierarchy. The
projectors chosen to participate in this study projected various
images for approximately 4,000 hours. The initial test results,
recently announced by TI, asserts that DLP-based projectors
demonstrated superior picture reliability over the test period
while the LCD-based projectors suffered optical degradation
that were catastrophic. The images provided below show the
drastic differences in DLP (pictured left) and LCD (pictured
right) projector images after 3,312 hours of projection. The
study revealed that LCD-based projectors produced a visible
picture defect after 2,500 hours of operation. DLP-based projectors,
however, did not produce a visible picture defect well beyond
4,000 hours of operation. Failure occurred in the blue, red,
and green channel polarizer and panels of LCD-based projectors.
Given these results, it appears that LCD-based projectors
fail at approximately the same time a single lamp would fail.
Meanwhile, DLP-based projectors’ image quality was proven
to outlast that of LCD projectors by 37 percent.
Projector
Vendors who are DLP purists will likely cheer and embrace
the study for all that its worth. The study provides evidence
that these DLP projectors are superior to LCD offerings in
terms of picture reliability and TCO. Pure DLP projector Vendors
include Dell, HP, and the newest player of them all, Gateway.
At the same time, there are Vendors who offer both LCD and
DLP-based projectors. In these organizations it is unlikely
that the results in this study will be used to market and
sell any of their products at the expense of half (or more
than half) of their product lines. This study, however, should
be taken seriously by all players in the industry. Vendors
that offer both LCD and DLP-based projectors must take this
evidence and validate it internally and use their findings
along with those from the TI study to effectively plan future
product strategies. Vendors that offer both LCD and DLP projectors
include: InFocus Corporation, ViewSonic, Sony, and Toshiba.
Driving
down projector TCO will inevitably lure new customers into
the market. The educational and consumer markets, both particularly
young and promising for the maturing projector industry, have
not reached their potential due, in part, to the cost of maintaining
the projector (i.e. lamp replacements, unit replacements).
The educational market remains apprehensive in making the
leap from traditional overhead projectors to multimedia projection
techniques. In order to engage this segment, Vendors must
provide as much reassurance as possible that technologies
they upgrade to today will continue to be used three, four,
and even five years from now. That being said, the picture
reliability advantage that DLP technology has over LCD technology
is a viable selling point. DLP projectors’ ability to
provide greater picture reliability as compared to their LCD
counterparts will also engage the consumer market. Because
consumers are not accustomed to constantly investing in their
television sets, a projector that needs a $500 lamp replacement
every 2,000 hours is a hard sell. Projectors are not positioned
as a replacement for the consumer television. Rather, projectors
are successfully positioned as an added home theater component;
a specialty item that is used for big sports games, family
home movie night, or showing off summer vacation slides. Proponents
of LCD technology will likely argue that the image quality
three years from now of a projector one buys today may not
be of importance. If one assumes that a projector is used
an average of 900 hours per year, LCD-based projectors that
fail image quality tests after 2,500 hours would last an end-user
at least 2.5 years from the date of purchase.
At the
same time, because the projector industry is constantly evolving,
end-users cannot be assured that their projector will not
be obsolete in two or three years based solely on picture
reliability rates. The industry will change with the realization
of the LCoS projector and new benchmarks in terms of resolution,
brightness, and contrast. While many projectors are traded
in and/or discarded after only a few years of use, the picture
reliability factor is not necessarily negated during the buying
process. On the contrary, most end-users will not likely anticipate
trading in/up their new projectors on the day of purchase.
Thus, the security of knowing that the projector they purchase
today will still project a quality image three years from
now is a strong selling point that manufacturers, Resellers,
and end-users will likely take seriously.
Despite
the changes and flux incurred by the projector industry, ARS
believes that picture reliability will affect the product
road maps of Vendors and the buying decisions of end-users
in all market segments. This new evidence that DLP-based projectors
offer greater picture reliability as compared to LCD-based
projectors will open new opportunities within the consumer
and education markets, as well as strengthen selling points
into corporations and small business. Although the TI study
does not definitively prove the superiority of DLP-based projectors
over LCD-based projectors, its results provide evidence that
DLP-based projectors effectively have lower TCO because their
picture reliability over time is greater. Thus, this study
suggests DLP-based projectors may just give LCD-based projectors
a run for their money.
|
RESEARCH
HOW LOW DID HP GO? : A Second Look at How HP Color
LaserJets Set The Pace (As Well As The Prices) For Domestic
Color Page Printers
By:
Bridget
Kester, Printers Industry Analyst
As a
slow economy continues to plague the industry, manufacturers
are searching for the perfect price point to gain market share
while at the same time remaining profitable. HP, with its
strong brand name, has long been the market leader and has
set the pricing trend. In January 2002, ARS took a look at
HP’s pricing of its Color LaserJet printers and its
impact on the market. During the time since this analysis,
HP continued its role as market leader by completing its merger
with Compaq Computer in May 2002, introducing replacement
models for its printer lineup, and adding an entry-level color
laser printer. Here we will take a second look at HP’s
color laser printer pricing strategy, how it relates to its
monochrome pricing, and what this means for the industry in
the coming years. Previously, ARS asked the question: How
low will HP go when setting prices for its new benchmark products?
The question arose as HP was on the verge of unveiling its
next generation of laser printers and pricing had not yet
been set. Would HP continue its trend of significantly lowering
prices with each new model? In October 1998, HP’s Color
LaserJet 4500N ($2,900) replaced the Color LaserJet 5M ($4,900),
representing a 40 percent decrease. Then, in October 2000,
the 4550N, at $2,400, replaced the 4500N, a 17 percent drop
in price. How much further could HP go?
In January
2002, ARS recommended that rather than perpetuate a destructive
cycle of price erosion for a technology segment that justifies
substantial investment in research and development, HP should
adopt a new pricing strategy for its next generation Color
LaserJet printers. ARS suggested a strategy more in line with
more mature market segments, such as monochrome lasers; HP
has been a leader in the monochrome laser segment for more
than 15 years, using a simple pricing strategy: more product,
same price.

Apparently
by the time HP introduced its next-generation color laser
printer, the LaserJet 4600N, HP thought the color page printer
market had matured enough to adopt a pricing strategy more
like the one used for its monochrome products. HP introduced
the LaserJet 4600N for $2,300, a mere $50 below the average
street price for the existing LaserJet 4550N – representing
less than a two percent price decrease. Prices appear to have
stabilized around the $2,300 price point. As shown in the
chart above, the market tends to mimic the market leader and
has kept average street prices consistently 25-30 percent
below the market leader.
Although
HP is holding the line at the $2,300 mark for Base Network
Model A4 color page printers, overall HP A4 Color LaserJet
prices have lowered with the addition of a new entry-level
color laser. With the Color LaserJet 2500 series, HP enters
the sub-$1,000 range for color laser printing, expanding the
breadth of HP color laser printers to now cover the low-end
as well as the high end. As a result, HP’s average A4
color LaserJet price is closer in line with the market average
of $1,570.

As
the market leader with a solid brand name, HP historically
enjoyed the luxury of almost never having to drop prices of
its page printers; street prices of its Color LaserJets only
fell when new models replaced old ones. If history were to
repeat itself, the $999 Color LaserJet 2500L introductory
price point would have been just a beginning point and HP
would have continued to lower its price on each successive
entry-level model introduction. However, with increased competition
in the entry-level segment, HP was forced to alter its game
plan. Only five months after it was introduced, HP lowered
its street price on the Color LaserJet 2500L by 6 percent,
to $899. The entry-level market could be a tough arena for
the market leader. While the HP brand was able to command
a higher price in other segments, it is proving to be a bit
more difficult amongst the more cost-conscious entry-level
buyers. HP and Minolta-QMS are currently fighting a battle
in the segment, trying to gain market share by lowering prices
or offering incentives, while other manufacturers such as
Okidata are also entering the segment. Minolta-QMS was the
first to enter the sub-$1,000 segment when it introduced the
Magicolor 2300 Desklaser for $799 in September 2002. HP quickly
responded with the LaserJet 2500L, first available in October
2002 for $999. The two manufacturers have been battling each
other in the segment, causing HP to lower its price on the
HP 2500L to $899. In January 2003, Okidata joined the competition
with the introduction of the Oki C5100N LED entry-level printer
for $999.

The
manufacturers are jockeying for market leadership by introducing
products for lower and lower prices, forcing them to produce
even more stripped down versions. HP and Minolta-QMS have
come out with additional models to capture customers that
are looking for an even lower price point. The Minolta-QMS
Magicolor 2300W, announced at the end of March, is a Windows-only,
non-network version of the Magicolor 2300 Desklaser offered
for $699. As early as the first week of April, HP is expected
to announce the LaserJet 1500, another model in the LaserJet
2500 series, for an estimated street price of $799. The LaserJet
1500 is a stripped down version of the LaserJet 2500L. It
is a host-based version that has a 150-MHz processor compared
to a 300MHz processor, 16MB standard memory versus 64MB standard
memory, a USB interface only, and is not compatible with Windows
NT or Macintosh versions 8.6 or higher, like the LaserJet
2500L.
As
it has historically, HP is expected to continue introducing
new models for successively lower prices. At a certain point
color laser printer prices will be low enough to become a
viable option for the average entry-level monochrome laser
printer user and prices will stabilize. So, the one remaining
question is: How low will HP go in the color entry-level segment?
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
Grab
the attention of the top CHANNEL decision makers NOW! Put
a contextual ad message in ChannelMedia where you know it
will get read and for a fraction of the price of an ad in
a trade publication!
See
the opportunities at www.channel-media.com/mediakit. |
|
 |
COMMUNITY
Changing Channels:
Can This One Be Saved? Do We Care?
By
ChannelMedia Columnist Steve Cross |
|
Apple is looking
at Vivendi to purchase Universal Music. How odd. Or is it?
If you were Apple, what would you do with several billion
in cash? Build more desktop machines? I don't think so. How
do these guys survive, and after the years of their messing
with Vendors and their Retailers, do any of us care anymore?
But it’s
a good question, I think. I remember the mid-80's and early
90's, when the Mac was a cultural and business phenomenon.
During at least one of those years, Apple was #1 in laptop
sales at retail, with something like a 22% market share. Then
their elitist mentality, poor marketing, and an all-out assault
on their (prior) exclusivity of user interface by the folks
in Redmond tossed them on the slagheap of declining market
share.
At some point Apple
became mostly irrelevant, except for the video and graphics
applications. You don't “need” a Mac for anything
else. Why else would they be a 3% market share player? Then
came the iMac, and later the iPod. Industrial design made
them relevant, at least for a source of styling and possibly
new ideas. They make money, but on lower unit sales each year.
I ask again, what
would you do if you had their several billion in cash? Well,
they are the Quicktime guys, the iPod guys, the industrial
design wizards of this age. I'd pour the dough into leading
the handheld market for consumer applications of video. Quicktime
is MPEG-4. Add AAC audio to it, and you have fabulous interactivity,
awesome compresion, all in a stylish form factor. Buy a studio,
repurpose all the video archives, convert them to MPEG-4,
sell them again (how many White Albums by the Beatles do we
each own???!!!), and make dough hand over fist. Build in the
Digital Rights Management stuff so all the artists will feel
confident licensing their music and video. Then slam the market.
Be the total first mover and leader. That's what I'd do.
Then I'd take the
most litigious firm on the planet (Apple is next to Disney
on this) and go after all the companies stealing legitimate
music from the artists. And I'd go after the users. Pardon
me, but at least half of us reading this article make our
livings from protected copyrights and prior-art patents. How
hypocritical is it to profit off copyrights and then steal
somebody else's copyrighted materials, and pretend it isn't
just plain wrong? I'd sue the pants off everyone, just to
clear a space for the launch of this new market. Heck, Apple
has BILLIONS in cash. Then I'd blow the doors off the market
with this new space. Handhelds, portables, PDAs, telephone
handsets. Become a consumer company. Oh, yeah, and start treating
the Retailers like real partners.
Apple could become
relevant. Just by using my plan. See, I'm not as dumb as I
look......
Steve
Cross is Director of Channel Sales at iVast, world leader
in MPEG-4 end-to-end solutions. Scross@ivast.com,
702-492-7472.
|
| 
COMMUNITY
Asset
Creation, Mining, Management…Broadcasters Learning to
Do More for Less
By
G.A. “Andy” Marken
Andy@markencom.com
Networks,
local stations, cable groups and companies are quickly finding
that they can do more for less and they can take advantage
of content long ago shoved into drawers, closets and basements.
Big (and expensive) production capabilities are rapidly being
replaced with low-cost, high-performance PCs, video production
software, DVD production devices and large – very large
– video asset libraries. Consumer electronics products
have quickly moved up-scale in capabilities and features while
more far-sighted broadcast hardware and software producers
have been moved down the food chain with compact, easier-to-use,
more powerful and more economic solutions. In between, a totally
new product category has emerged – digital asset management.
It was clearly obvious at this year’s National Association
of Broadcast (NAB) conference in Las Vegas as long-time, established
exhibitors struggled to show how they fit into the new market
category. At the same time, firms from the CE and IT industries
boldly staked their claim on helping firms create, produce,
manage and use new and existing video content. Video producers
– television, Hollywood and corporate – have always
focused on creating newer, better and more dramatic content
which had a relatively short use life before it was retired.
Even though
the video assets disappeared from the organization’s
main production floor, they weren’t simply thrown aside.
Sometimes huge areas were set aside to protect and preserve
the video content for the time when it might be needed. The
challenge increasingly has been that the referenced video
content has been needed quickly, but locating it sometimes
takes hours or days. When it was located, there was always
a question as to whether it was still useable. The combination
of the war, the economy and budgets that demanded new solutions
that would quickly produce a profit were heavily featured
at this year’s NAB show. Firms like Apple, HP, Sun and
SGI joined forces with firms like Pinnacle Systems, Ulead,
InterVideo, Adobe and Sonic (Solutions and Foundry) to show
standard and HD production solutions that didn’t require
board-level approval. Storage and distribution was another
major focal point for NAB visitors as DVD slowly began its
trek to replace tape in many applications. Sony showed the
broadest range of storage solutions with their SuperMulti
drives that wrote both +/-R/RW media, as well as their next
generation blue laser drive/media that allowed 23+GB of digital
data to be stored on a single-sided disc. At the same time,
firms like Microboards, Primera and Rimage showed production
companies how they could quickly, easily and economically
produce and distribute custom content in hours rather than
days/weeks.
But it
was the high capacity digital libraries that fired up the
imagination of network, local station, Hollywood and corporate
content producers. Whether they were going to use the systems
for digital storage of dailies, video asset libraries or lights-out
broadcast facilities; operation and facilities managers were
quick to grasp the staff, quality and asset preservation potential
that they could achieve with the new DVD libraries. Firms
like Leitch, Rorke, ASACA, Globalstor and SeaChange demonstrated
how inexpensive it was to store days and weeks of new and
historical video content that could be quickly accessed so
the right commercial, ID, news or entertainment segment was
on the air at a moments notice. Many of the attendees who
had grown up in the fragile tape environment almost immediately
saw the potential for having keystroke access to any video
segment from hundreds of hours of content stored in a 3-foot
by 3-foot jukebox. But it was the underlying fabric of digital
asset management that created the greatest excitement because
it suddenly brought all of the components together making
everything available.
To highlight
the importance and value of asset management, a new association
made its debut at NAB. GSAM (“Gee-Sam” –
Global Society of Asset Management) was announced at the show
with founding members that included Ascent Media, Artesia,
Avid and RightsLine. An international association, GSAM was
formed to focus on the emerging Digital Asset Management arena.
Richard Eberhart, GSAM Executive Director, pointed out that
historically broadcasters and organizations have only focused
on developing content, but these firms increasingly understand
that the content is a valuable and reusable asset that can
be mined and used again and again. “Effective control
of the media and metadata is going to be the key to their
success in the future,” he emphasized. Like the MPEG
and DVD Forums, GSAM hopes to influence standards that will
promote openness and interoperability between the organization’s
systems. The organization hopes to stimulate the sharing of
lessons learned as well as bring together and share the expertise
of thought leaders in the industry. Two trends are driving
Digital Asset Management today. The first is every organization’s
need to concisely demonstrate the economic viability of any
acquisition. Secondly, as we have seen over the past two-three
years, the broadcast and production industries are rapidly
moving to a digital, file-based technology and infrastructure.
Gone with
the smoke-filled conference rooms of yesterday are the concepts
of own the biggest and most expensive content production facility
in town or purchase the latest bells and whistles so the guy
down the street doesn’t get there first. Sound economic
justification has had to replace the freeflow of money to
acquire technology. Every media content development/delivery
organization is forced to explain every expenditure in terms
of how it will deliver added value, enhance efficiency or
meet a specific need. Today’s budgets are increasingly
being invested on strategic initiatives. The initiatives are
designed to enable the organizations to achieve tactical and
evolutionary growth, rather than venture too close to the
revolutionary change chasm.
Because
of the industry’s focus on near-term benefits and rapid
payback, the emphasis by the emerging hardware, software and
integration leaders focused less attention on bleeding edge
technology and more attention on solutions that meet strategic
and tactical needs and produce a rapid return-on-investment.
Rather than being a technology advance, digital asset management
solutions are being discussed in terms of business needs.
The solutions are being discussed as an underlying infrastructure
for production, asset utilization and playback.
At NAB,
and in fact across the industry, digital media is becoming
ubiquitous in production and distribution activities. At this
year’s show, more than 80 firms highlighted the asset
or content management capabilities of their products/solutions.
It was obvious on the display floor and in the working sessions
that as the industry moves rapidly to digital and HD production,
products must support digital, file-based media. Increasingly,
purchasing organizations also think in terms of being able
to support, access and display that media content for years.
The trend has forced asset technology management to think
about the total lifecycle of content development and distribution
– immediately and in the future. Echoing the importance
of Digital Asset Management, Sun Microsystems unveiled their
end-to-end DAM reference architecture, while HP continued
to stress their series of recommendations. By following the
reference guidelines of these firms, media businesses can
deploy a complete content management system for television
and rich media enterprises. The fairly flexible and open reference
guide will enable media businesses to leverage and extend
their legacy platforms into next generation DAM systems. Sun
officials contend that the reference architecture will be
an important tool to help both sides of the media organizations
– media technology and business – minimize the
costs and optimize the results of transitioning to tomorrow’s
distributed content data center infrastructure.
Key
DAM Areas
Directly and indirectly, Sun and other NAB firms in the digital
asset management category identified a number of key application/solution/business
areas. These include:
-
Video Repositories, Archives – The normal
venue for digital asset management, this includes catalog,
search, management, retrieving and archiving digital video
assets. Usually these are finished elements rather than
in-production work. Typically managed finished or approved
media elements not in production content.
-
Content Management, Digital Storage – This
is nearline storage solutions for digital content. These
products move the content to video servers for automation
and playback.
-
Broadcast Automation, Playback – Because
these applications are unique, firms such as Crispin, Encoda
and Sundance typically offer these solutions that are integrated
into larger solutions.
-
Asset Management in Digital Production –
These products usually include Non-Linear Editing (NLE)
tools, graphic and audio production environments, as well
as graphics and effects applications. Low-resolution, prosy-based
applications have been introduced in this category that
support the ability to create, edit, browse, search and
produce quality work with a standard desktop or notebook
computer. Firms like AVID, Apple, Adobe, Sonic, InterVideo,
Ulead and Pinnacle Systems have unveiled a wide range of
high-performance, economic and easy-to-use products in this
category.
-
News, Sports Production Asset Management –
News and sports production solutions have improved significantly
in both price and performance over the past two years. Digital
content can be taken directly from incoming news and sports
feeds. The feeds are stored on digital servers and the content
is immediately available to the news and sports production
teams using search, select, drag and drop.
-
Facilities Management – These products include
long-term organizational and physical content management
and storage.
-
Corporate Media Management – This area encompasses
business and corporate information and assets including
Powerpoint presentations to images, logos and media Ids
and similar assets.
-
Digital Distribution, Delivery – This is
becoming an increasingly popular and crowded category because
it encompasses both revenue generation and ad spot delivery,
as well as the rapidly growing area of digital content distribution
from such firms as RealNetworks, AT&T, NTT and others.
It is also an area which Microsoft is showing great interest
in entering.
- Middleware
– Available since the first ENIAC was put into use,
this software category has found a new career in the broadcast
and entertainment environments. Middleware provides the
ability to seamlessly search, find and leverage digital
assets throughout their life. While middleware offers considerable
promise, it also requires significant integration and software
development.
Unlike
many of the company’s initiatives, Sun’s DAM reference
architecture follows the less formal recommendations of HP
and is surprisingly open. While Sun’s objective was
to stimulate and simplify the specification and implementation
of the company’s proven platform, media technology and
business management can also implement Linux, Mac and Windows-based
hardware and software solutions into the architecture, if
they choose. To broaden appeal, the company has also partnered
with major firms including Harris Automation, Sony Electronics,
Telestream, Thomson Grass Valley, Virage and others.
DAM is
becoming an area of primary concern for broadcast television
networks and stations, cable and satellite networks, media
creation and distribution firms, as well as corporations that
want to develop and take advantage of their own scalable,
available content solutions. The challenge which Sun and most
of the other digital asset management suppliers quickly pass
over when talking with executives in the broadcast, entertainment
and corporate content arena is that none of the solutions
are simply plug-and-play. They require the assistance of seasoned
systems integrators. Unlike traditional software development
and IT integration firms, these integrators also require extensive
experience and expertise in the broadcast and digital media
environments.
Requiring
equal parts of art, science and technology, digital asset
management is rapidly becoming the major underpinnings of
the broadcast and entertainment industries. Open standards
are slowly – and painfully – emerging to ensure
these organizations move into the brave new world of interoperable,
readily and immediately available content production and delivery.
At the
same time, the standards and solutions also have to encompass
business and production workflow that will quickly and economically
deliver benefits to the content owners, broadcasters, deliverers
and users. Ideally, organizations want an integrated media
management solution that will work across all of their media-driven
business and workflow areas. The solutions will allow these
firms to search, find, repurpose and manage their digital
content anywhere and anytime to meet specific application
requirements.
Competition
Forces Change
As competitive pressure from conventional and new sources
force broadcast, entertainment and corporate management to
take a new look at all of their digital assets, those being
developed as well as those hidden in cabinets and storage
rooms, new requirements and new solutions will emerge. They
are forcing asset and business management to select specific
Vendors and specific products/solutions based on both short
and long-term media production and management goals.
The organizations
that make a very comfortable living catering to the network
and Hollywood executives are going to have to aggressively
and painfully reinvent themselves as younger, more aggressive
and more agile hardware, software and integration players
deliver a greater range of features and capabilities at a
lower overall cost. Content developers and owners are finding
that there is still significant profit available if they are
able to efficiently and effectively manage, manipulate and
share their information and media.
The evolving
family of digital asset management products, solutions and
solution integrators can potentially enable NAB members to
achieve their goals.
G.A.
"Andy" Marken is President of Marken Communications,
Inc., a 25-year-old marketing and communications agency, specializing
in content development, management, storage and delivery.
The agency's experience includes work with firms such as:
AT&T/CERFnet, ASACA, InfoValue, Matsushita/Panasonic,
Pinnacle Systems, Mitsubishi Chemical, Recordable DVD Council,
Verbatim, InterVideo, Philips and Plasmon Data.
He can be reached at Andy@markencom.com.
|
|
|